◀ Back to PCNA
ATP5O — PCNA
Protein-Protein interactions - manually collected from original source literature:
Studies that report less than 10 interactions are marked with *
Text-mined interactions from Literome
Henneke et al., J Mol Biol 2002
:
The Pab proliferating cell nuclear antigen ( PCNA ) activated the PabRFC complex in a DNA dependent manner, but the PabRFC-small
ATPase activity was neither DNA dependent nor
PCNA dependent ... Finally, ( i ) the PabRFC-large fraction cross reacted with anti-human-RFC PCNA binding domain antibody, corroborating the conservation of the protein sequence, ( ii ) the human
PCNA stimulated the PabRFC complex
ATPase activity in a DNA dependent way and ( iii ) the PabRFC complex could load human PCNA onto primed single stranded circular DNA, suggesting that the PCNA binding domain of RFC has been functionally conserved during evolution
Shiomi et al., Genes Cells 2004
:
The purified Chl12-RFC complex is structurally indistinguishable from RFC, as shown by electron microscopy, and it exhibits DNA stimulated
ATPase activity that is further
enhanced by
PCNA , and by DNA binding activity on specific primer/template DNA structures
Bagewadi et al., J Virol 2004
:
The site-specific nicking closing activity and the
ATPase function of IMYMV Rep were
impaired by
PCNA
Yoder et al., J Biol Chem 1991
:
Calf thymus
PCNA also
stimulated the
ATPase activity of yeast RF-C and participated in holoenzyme formation with DNA polymerase delta
Tsurimoto et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990
:
Furthermore,
PCNA stimulated the RF-C
ATPase activity and is, therefore, analogous to the phage T4 gene 45 protein, which stimulates the ATPase function of the gene 44/62 protein complex
McNally et al., BMC structural biology 2010
:
We show that simultaneous mutation of Lys 20, Lys 77, Arg 80, and Arg 149, which interact with DNA in the RFC-PCNA-DNA model, compromises the ability of yeast
PCNA to
stimulate the DNA dependent
ATPase activity of RFC when the DNA is long enough to extend through the clamp ... Fluorescence anisotropy binding experiments show that the inability of the mutant clamp proteins to stimulate RFC
ATPase activity is likely
caused by reduction in the affinity of the
RFC-PCNA complex for DNA
Oku et al., Genes Cells 1998
:
Competition between p21 and pol delta or RFC for binding to
PCNA results in efficient inhibition of its stimulation of pol delta DNA synthesis and RFC
ATPase but not of PCNA loading on DNA by RFC